Search for: "Federal v. Levine"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,213
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2008, 6:04 am
Levine. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 1:15 pm
On February 20, in the Riegel v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 12:08 pm
, and Wyeth v Levine (are state law claims that injected drugs were mislabeled preempted by federal FDA labeling requirements). [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
The case on which hopes of federalism hang is now Wyeth v Levine, a case set for argument in the coming Fall term. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 2:34 pm
Last month, in Riegel v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 10:06 am
In the wake of last month's Supreme Court decision in Riegel v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 10:48 am
Levine next Term.Souter could go either way.8. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 5:32 pm
[17] Levine, supra note 6 [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:01 am
Levine, in which the federal government and pharmaceutical manufacturers argue that Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of prescription drug labeling preempts state "failure-to-warn" litigation, and in Altria v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
Levine, No. 06-1249, that pre-emption is implicit in the structure of the statute. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 11:38 am
Medtronic (Nov. 2) bodes well for the cause of federal preemption in the pending Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
In Levine, as we've mentioned, there aren't any allegations of violations at all. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 5:42 am
Medtronic and Levine v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 10:11 am
Levine, 06-1249). [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 7:55 am
Well, imagine you're a federal agency. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 6:24 am
Levine, pending the Court’s decisions in No. 06-179, Riegel v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 4:38 pm
Levine, case number 06-1249, in which the Solicitor General just filed a brief at the invitation of the Court. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:57 am
" Lamie v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 5:25 am
In Eiseman Levine Lehrhaupt & Kakoyiannis, P.C. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
The first wave of defense briefing is now complete in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
