Search for: "Frank v. United States" Results 1161 - 1180 of 2,047
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2019, 7:19 am by John Jascob
Digital Realty Trust, the Supreme Court held 9-0 that the Dodd-Frank anti-retaliation provision applies only to whistleblowers who report their concerns to the SEC, not to those who only file internal reports.In Lucia v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 7:43 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
Kaplinsky In its decision last week in PHH Corporation v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm by Vercammen Law
When discovery ended in early January 2020, Care One moved for summary judgment, seeking a determination that plaintiff could not assert a claim based on Care One's breach of any state or federal statutes or regulations. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 6:33 am by Ronald Mann
The earliest cases involved entities like the Bank of the United States; the most recent one is a 1992 decision, American National Red Cross v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am by Roshonda Scipio
Knight.Rome : Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2010. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am by Jack McNeill
The resurgence of secularism: hostility towards religion in the United States and France. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:15 am by Broc Romanek
" In this order, the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia found that - in AFLAC v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:57 am by Zak Gowen
On this point, the Court of Appeal chose a test different from the one applied at first instance, applying the test from the Supreme Court decision in the case of Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Group Litigation v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:59 am by John Elwood
Alabama, 16-7835 Issue: Whether a state court can enforce a rule that Brady v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 8:39 am by Richard Renner
This decision applies only to those employees who work for private companies in the United States and have a right to organize a union. [read post]
26 May 2009, 11:34 am
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Arterton, J.) granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on all counts. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm by Matthew Bush
United StatesDocket: 11-959Issue(s): (1) Whether, when a false statement is made to an individual who has no connection whatsoever to the federal government, the false statement is nonetheless made in a “matter within the jurisdiction” of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]