Search for: "French v. French"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 5,346
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
… and the appeal was dismissed.Should you wish to download the whole decision (in French), just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
7 May 2021, 8:00 am
Radical title of the crown and aboriginal Title: North America 1763, New South Wales 1788 and New Zealand 1840 David V. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:48 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Johnson v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 9:04 am
Conversant claimed that this was consistent with Justice Birss's decision in the UK case Unwired Planet v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 2:31 pm
The word is rich with meaning, meaning that shifts subtly over the long arc of its engagement with the cultures that have used the word as the sign toward which meaning (and metaphor) could be attached.impeach (v.)formerly also empeach, late 14c., empechen, "to impede, hinder, prevent;" early 15c., "cause to be stuck, run (a ship) aground," also "prevent (from doing something)," from Anglo-French empecher, Old French empeechier "to… [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 3:20 am
This book is a must read for anyone interested in the French legacy of slavery and law in the Americas. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 1:27 am
One such ruling is Actavis UK Ltd v Eli Lilly & Company [2013] EWHC 3749 (Pat), a decision of Mr Justice Arnold in the Patents Court, England and Wales, on 27 November 2013. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 9:47 am
Maison Fauré Le Page, a French-based company in Paris since 1716, transferred to its sole shareholder, the company Saillard, in 1992. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
The most-consulted French-language decision was Quebec (Agence du Revenu) v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:00 am
Morland-Jones v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
Each Wednesday we tell you which three English-language cases and which French-language case have been the most viewed* on CanLII and we give you a small sense of what the cases are about. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
Leggat v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:24 pm
DeHart v. [read post]
