Search for: "Garcia v. State"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,574
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2010, 9:53 am
In the case of Garcia v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 1:44 am
State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:07 pm
" Bartlett v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 5:37 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 2:22 pm
LEXIS 99842 (ED CA, Sept. 10, 2010), a California federal magistrate judge rejected a Muslim inmate's motion for a temporary injunction to transfer him from state to federal custody because state officials allegedly interfered with his ability to fast for Ramadan in 2008.In Serna v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 4:05 am
State v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:00 am
Juan Jose Fernandez Garcia and Luis Martin Caro Sanchez, Case No. 10 C 5268 (N.D. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 11:56 am
The Court notes that the effect of Wyeth is to strengthen the presumption against preemption that was weakened in Garcia [v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 9:57 am
Federal law makes it a crime for an alien to enter the United States after being deported. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 9:57 am
Federal law makes it a crime for an alien to enter the United States after being deported. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 12:45 pm
California v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 1:27 pm
R40852 Subjects: Criminal Justice CRS Reports, 111th Congress (7/28/2010; Posted: 8/11/2010) United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 10:21 am
In Garcia v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 12:02 pm
Garcia, 474 F.3d 994 (7th Cir. 2007)). [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 7:47 am
See Garcia v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 12:37 pm
Foltz v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 4:22 am
Eleventh Amendment immunity lost should a state adopt the Fair Labor Standards Act as state lawMueller v Thompson, CA7, 133 F.3d 1063In Seminole Tribe v Florida, 517 US 44, the U.S. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 10:21 am
That battle has largely turned out to be a debate between the pro-preemption position set forth by the Sixth Circuit in Garcia v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 11:41 pm
File for harassment (TorrentFreak) United States US Patents – Decisions Federal Circuit holds-line on patent misuse defense: Princo Corp. v. [read post]
