Search for: "German v. German"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 5,196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2016, 9:10 pm
A call for papers has been issued for the 12th Franco-German Workshop for Young Researchers on Comparative Public Law, which will take place June 7-9, 2017, at the Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht. [read post]
20 May 2007, 7:28 am
Ashcroft v. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 6:47 am
The full job advert in German is available here. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
” German pointed out that the Supreme Court rulings in Brady v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 7:31 am
Microsoft v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:20 am
The first case (Axel Springer v Germany (App No 39954/08)) concerned media reports about a famous German TV personality who had been arrested for allegedly having used cocaine. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 1:20 am
Caroline Sophie Rapatz, University of Kiel, has just published her German-language Habilitationsschrift on “European Union Private International Law – Role Model or Hegemony? [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
German v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 11:27 am
According to some, this would amount to trade mark “genericide” but as InternKat Cecilia tells us, A googol of generic questions in Ninth Circuit's Elliott v Google decision were raised in this subject, ultimately deciding that the Google trade mark is still alive and well.Life as a Kat: gotta love those summer afternoon napsIn the seventh episode of the Life as an IP lawyer series, the AmeriKat brought us to Sydney, Australia to meet Wen Wu of Gilbert + Tobin. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:20 am
In December 2012, just before Christmas, and just before this Kat rejoined the blogging team, Arnold J handed down the decision Microsoft Corp v Motorola Mobility LLC [2012] EWHC 3677 (Pat) (21 December 2012). [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 11:27 am
According to some, this would amount to trade mark “genericide” but as InternKat Cecilia tells us, A googol of generic questions in Ninth Circuit's Elliott v Google decision were raised in this subject, ultimately deciding that the Google trade mark is still alive and well.Life as a Kat: gotta love those summer afternoon napsIn the seventh episode of the Life as an IP lawyer series, the AmeriKat brought us to Sydney, Australia to meet Wen Wu of Gilbert + Tobin. [read post]
28 May 2021, 10:32 pm
German automotive companies and their allies thought they could persuade politicians with anecdotal evidence, such as the Broadcom v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 7:38 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 3:31 pm
The Argentinians will almost certainly try to spoil the German flow, and Ghana and the United States have proven that the Germans can be held or hobbled. [read post]
Qualcomm's Mannheim Steamroller is stuttering: patents too young to defeat Apple in tech-savvy court
3 Oct 2018, 11:22 am
The first Qualcomm v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 7:27 am
The third issue of 2011 of the Dutch journal on Private International Law, Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht includes the following contributions on the Brussels I Recast (lis pendens and choice of court), Voluntary Assignment, and case notes on TNT Express v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:00 am
The discussion below is based upon the Chancery Court decision in Airgas, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:00 am
Yesterday, while keeping an eye on the fourth stage of the Giro d'Italia, this Kat spotted the latest judgment of the EU General Court, in case T-579/10, macros consult GmbH - Unternehmensberatung für Wirtschafts - und Finanztechnologie v OHIM - MIP. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:23 am
Following the recent CJEU decisions in Case C-617/15(Hummel v Nike, reported in various places including here) and joined Cases C-24/16 and C-25/16 (Nintendo v BigBen Interactive, reported on this very blawg), the English court’s decision in Poul Chang Metal Industry Company Ltd v Bailcast Ltd and Anor [2018] EWHC 3432 (Ch) has just become available. [read post]
15 May 2014, 8:45 pm
Electric Co. v. [read post]
