Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 7,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2016, 7:36 am
In Willemsen v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:54 am
The blog-worthy news about the business judgment rule is a December 13, 2011 court decision from a federal court in California in FDIC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 8:08 am
The court’s bottom line: Although the courts have not yet articulated a single clear standard on this issue, most of the federal circuits and one California Court of Appeal have held a disabled plaintiff can state a viable ADA claim for alleged unequal access to a private entity’s website if there is a sufficient nexus between the claimed barriers and the plaintiff’s ability to use or enjoy the goods and services offered at the defendant’s physical… [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 3:19 pm
California law is clear that voluntary tips left for an employee for goods sold or services performed belong to the employee, not the employer. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 10:45 am
For example, in a New York state case from 1995, Stratton Oakmont v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
People of the State of California v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 6:21 am
[State of California]: But, the children..... [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 7:50 am
This case is Omega S.A. v Costco Wholesale Corp., No. 11-57137 (9th Circ.).A grey market of genuine luxury goods Costco sold Omega “Seamaster” watches in its stores. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:15 am
We want to be good role models. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 1:15 pm
California precedent currently allows California courts to enforce judgments of other tribunals (e.g., other states) even when those judgments enforce gambling debts. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:47 am
It is not the first time that a New York bill providing for a post mortem right to publicity has failed to be enacted, but as some celebrities are now earning millions of dollars years after their demise, New York is likely to eventually join California and other the states which already have post mortem right to publicity statutes. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 10:53 am
" Mercer-Fraser Company v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 5:02 pm
Both state and federal. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
The case was Reynolds v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 4:40 pm
In a lengthy (70 page) opinion, the California Court of Appeals (Sixth District), in Shaw v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 9:21 am
Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
In California there have been serious outbreaks in recent years, leading the state to backtrack on its exemption. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:00 pm
The ADF brief also effectively quotes from the Supreme Court's 2004 Lockyer v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 9:30 pm
Earlier this year, the Supreme Court held in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:08 pm
Professor Miller recommends that: if you are looking for a solid case that delves into many of these topics, you could do a lot worse than the recent opinion of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in United States v. [read post]
