Search for: "Grant v. Commonwealth"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,620
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:24 am
In the Lehigh County case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 11:54 am
In the Lehigh County case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:26 pm
Braun v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
Shah v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:06 am
A Massachusetts Fourth Offense OUI conviction was upheld by the Appeals Court in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:51 am
The Massachusetts Appeals Court in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:18 am
In his April 8 decision in the case of Bingham v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 10:11 pm
In the recent case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:20 am
Beard, 633 F.3d 126 (3d Cir. 2011) (granting relief on Brady claim), with Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:20 am
Beard, 633 F.3d 126 (3d Cir. 2011) (granting relief on Brady claim), with Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:35 pm
Hernández Almodóvar passed along another Puerto Rico Second Amendment case, this one a trial court decision in Irizarry v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
20 May 2011, 6:00 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:32 am
Supreme Court granted certiorari. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:17 pm
Sheila argued that other regulators very likely missed cases where homeowners should have been granted loan modifications, but were denied improperly. [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
