Search for: "Grant v. United States of America"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 3,161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2018, 4:07 am
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 10:58 pm
That section states, in relevant part, that a “governmental unit may not deny, revoke, suspend, or refuse to renew a license, permit, charter, franchise, or other similar grant to, condition such a grant to, discriminate with respect to such a grant against, deny employment to, terminate the employment of, or discriminate with respect to employment against, a person that is or has been a debtor under this title…. [read post]
18 May 2023, 8:01 am
United States, as well as a second case, Brown v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 8:31 am
Nebgen (2nd Dept., decided 4/27/2010) In Graham v Dunkley, 50 AD3d 55 (2nd Dept. 2008), the Appellate Division, Second Department, held that "the Graves Amendment was a constitutional exercise of congressional power pursuant to the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 11:32 pm
To a complaint with the United States International Trade Commission (ITC). [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 1:58 pm
The suit is regarding the federal government bailouts of Citigroup and Bank of America and a FDIC program that guaranteed unsecured debt of private financial institutions and provided them “full coverage of non-interest bearing deposit transaction accounts, regardless of dollar amount” (Vern McKinley v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:28 pm
For the reasons hereinafter stated, we AFFIRM that decision. 07a0124p.06 2007/04/05 Cress v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 1:45 pm
Backstrom On October 13, 2017, Petitioners League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), et al. filed a motion to expedite briefing and hearing in League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,SECTION 1. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
" This blog hasn't talked about all the ridiculously obvious designs for which the USPTO has granted patents. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm
Canada In the case of Labourers’ International Union of North America, Local 183 v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 11:12 am
BMW of North America, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:26 am
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 1:06 pm
In order to receive temporary permission to enter the United States for a 2.5-year period, for the purpose of starting or scaling a start-up business in the United States, entrepreneurs would be required to demonstrate among other things, that their business would yield a ‘substantial’ potential for rapid business growth evidenced by: a significant investment of capital of at least$345,000 from certain qualified U.S. investors that have a proven… [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm
It is, therefore, of great consequence and concern that the California court summarily decided that the order made against Google could not be enforced in the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:59 am
<> The Hopi Tribe v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:23 am
These cases have all arisen very quickly since the United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 6:45 am
No nation has done more to advance the human condition than the United States of America and no people have done more to promote human progress than the citizens of our great nation. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:31 pm
The next part of Judge Posner’s discussion: I noticed a citation in the court’s opinion to a case from my court, United States v. [read post]
