Search for: "Gray v. Gray"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 2,757
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2023, 11:04 am
The defendant noted that in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:48 pm
(See eg Bernard Gray v UVW [2010] EWHC 2367 (QB) [33]). [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 5:44 pm
Mann in 1830 and State v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 5:24 am
Latest Cases Gray v News Group [2011] EWHC 349 (Ch) – 25 Feb 2011. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 12:27 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual Property'Gray Market' Seeds Not 'Genuine' for Lanham Act; Confusion of 'Sponsorship,' Deception LikelyZip International Group LLC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 12:39 am
Kase, 789 So. 2d 1095, 1097 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); see also Gray v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 12:21 am
Gray [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:27 am
The case is Lucchesi v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:35 am
” In this instance, said the court, the hearing officer’s findings were supported by substantial evidence.* Addressing another issue concerning the evidence presented in the course of the disciplinary hearing, the Appellate Division commented that “Hearsay evidence may be the basis for an administrative determination,” citing Gray v Adduci, 73 NY2d 741. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 7:41 pm
Carr, which led to Gray v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 5:30 pm
The 2014 GMO Legislation Scorecard – Mina Nasseri and Dan Herling of Mintz Levin on the firm’s blog, Consumer Product Matters Frackers v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 9:05 pm
” [Adam Steinman, Civil Procedure Blog, arguing from premises different from mine, on Fourth Circuit’s decision in McCleary-Evans v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 3:22 am
Auth., 43 AD3d 280, quoting Matter of Gray v Adduci, 73 NY2d 741. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:42 am
In summary, the court ruled that the exclusion of Lanham Act liability, established by the Second Circuit precedent (Rogers v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:39 pm
This was struck out by Sir Charles Gray ([2009] EWHC 2863 (QB)) and the defendant sought permission to appeal. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 2:43 am
On 9 July 2010 Mr Justice Stadlen began hearing a strike out application in the case of Kaschke v Gray, (see judgment [2010] EWHC 690 (QB)). [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 3:36 pm
Gray v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Zuccarini (The Gray Blog) (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (ipwars) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) District Court E D Michigan: Gripe site prevails in domain cybersquatting case: Career Agents Network, Inc v careeragentsnetwork.biz (Ars Technica) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Google - Google dismisses some claims and gets some attorneys’ fees: Jurin v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Zuccarini (The Gray Blog) (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (ipwars) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) District Court E D Michigan: Gripe site prevails in domain cybersquatting case: Career Agents Network, Inc v careeragentsnetwork.biz (Ars Technica) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Google - Google dismisses some claims and gets some attorneys’ fees: Jurin v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:28 am
State v. [read post]
