Search for: "He v. Holder"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 5,732
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2018, 11:16 pm
Lord Hodge concludes that the approach of Lord Briggs provides for more satisfactory protection for the holder of a purpose-limited patent. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:43 am
He cited to Cooper v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 10:21 am
FemSpec (FemSuite) v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
In Mintz v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 2:06 pm
Roark v. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
He was sued along with the student-borrower (Sheila Kirk), but he did not file an answer in the court below, and he did not appear for trial. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
Evans and Lawrence v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 1:25 pm
Sony Corp. of Am. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
In Decon Group, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:00 pm
In his five-page decision in Burdette v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:57 am
In Commonwealth v, Koch, a man was charged with possession of marijuana with the intent to deliver. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 4:50 pm
Holder, 569 U.S. 184, 190–91 . . . (2013). [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 7:58 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 9:10 am
Aktiebolag v. [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 4:33 am
He thus uses as his primary 802.11 comparable a royalty rate determined in 2003 by industry analyst InteCap, which he then divides by 25 to reflect the small value actually attributable to Motorola's patented technology. [read post]
26 May 2014, 5:35 am
In Petrella v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 7:57 am
Matter of Kapon v Koch, 23 NY3d 32 [2014]). [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 12:54 am
The recent Federal Trial Court decision of Pharmacommunications Holdings Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 3:20 pm
Co. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:35 am
Holder and Shelby County v. [read post]
