Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 82,097
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2011, 8:44 am
Janus v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
Thus, the test of compulsion remained unaltered and Irwin LJ held: 74. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 8:29 am
<> CTS Corp. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 6:46 am
State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 11:00 pm
In Presser v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Last year in Kaul v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 11:43 am
A state cannot be sued for copyright infringement because Congress did not validly abrogate sovereign immunity when it enacted the Copyright Remedy Clarification Act of 1990, the Supreme Court held Monday in Allen v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 4:21 pm
Nance v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 4:00 pm
In Budlong v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 1:04 am
[In Kirkpatrick v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 1:53 pm
In State v Daniel Davies, the Appellate Division held that the prosecutor may not make admission into the PTI (pre-trial intervention)program contingent on the defendant pleading guilty to the underlying offense. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 12:32 pm
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held [opinion, PDF] that the FAA does not preempt a... [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:23 am
Mazda Motors of America [docket], finding that a federal minimum safety standard [text] does not preempt state tort actions. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 2:00 am
The case is Hawaii Floriculture and Nursery Association v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 6:00 am
In McCoy v Louisiana, 584 U. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 6:41 am
The Court of Appeals of Tennessee at Nashville filed its written opinion on Renken v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 12:30 pm
In 1992, the Supreme Court held in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2006, 12:00 pm
In Clark v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:20 am
In the case of Castleberry v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm
Last year, in a high-profile case (and opinion), a Ninth Circuit panel held that A.B. 5 -- passed essentially to try to classify Uber and Lyft drivers as employees rather than independent contractors (something that Proposition 22 later reversed) -- was likely unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause, despite the fact that the standard of review was rational basis. [read post]
