Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: T. S." Results 1161 - 1180 of 182,337
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2008, 8:21 am
Personally, I think that anyone that prattles on about how Miranda hurts the police and such, should be forced to post a bond which would be forfeit as soon as one of their relatives "confesses" to a crime they didn't commit while being interrogated. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:45 am by Peter
But, as James Maule reports in If Congress Says So, Don’t Blame the IRS, in most cases it’s just a case of killing the messenger: What’s interesting is the [...] [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm by David Friedman
The author's conclusion is that the debate has become a status conflict, with each side taking the position that it is wise and good, the other side the opposite. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 9:46 am by Daniel Shaviro
 But repeal of the rule wouldn't rebut plutocracy's continued prevalence. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 3:23 am
But when I go see him, he's never there and he doesn't return any of my messages. [read post]
8 Oct 2016, 11:08 am by Eric Goldman
Yes, I know “interesting personal jurisdiction case” is an oxymoron, but hear me out. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 7:09 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
“Transferring operational control of a company to one’s children would not constitute the establishment of a qualified blind trust, nor would it eliminate conflicts of interest” under federal statutes governing conflicts of interest, said the letter, written by OGE Director Walter M. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:54 am by Eugene Volokh
She’s in your house and she’s under your authority, but perhaps she feels that your authority isn’t just. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 11:46 am
And I promise -- on my word as MSN Money's tax expert -- that I'll send it back to you on April 15, without interest. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:09 am by SHG
  Don’t do it because it’s right and the ideology is flawed. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 8:47 am by John McFarland
HB 3068 would have required operators, upon request, to provide royalty owners the calculations used to determine the royalty owner’s decimal interest on a division order. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
It is well established that product protection is available for medically-related products even though it may hamper the medical practitioner’s freedom to operate.NB: There are other interesting items in the decision, such as the request for a legal hint by the Board.Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia August 19, 2011Briscoe v. [read post]