Search for: "In Re EM" Results 1161 - 1180 of 3,438
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2006, 6:16 pm
Too bad, you just lost $1 million cause nobody came to see 'em play and you're gonna lose another million cause nobody but the hillbillies from West Virginny are coming. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 3:12 pm by Glo
Bryan EMS and Fire assisted with the accident investigation. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:11 pm
Em discussão: saber se o relator do RE 631.102 está prevento para julgar o RE 632.238. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:50 pm
"  At which point the general would surely say:  "We'd love to, but the sub won't do it unless we write 'em an extra $15,000, which we're not going to do, because it's pure extortion. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 3:02 pm
Em discussão: Saber se o relator do RE 631102 está prevento para julgar o RE 632238. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:21 am by Russ Bensing
  Well, if you’re a non-confrontational weenie like me, you’ll probably figure you’re out 75 cents and that’s the end of it. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 4:46 am
Briden, Opposition No. 91160087 [Section 2(d) opposition to registration of the mark SOCK-UM for a "game where a labeled mat is placed on the ground or floor, participants position themselves on the mat and volley a sock back and forth from one half of the mat to the other half of the mat," in light of the registered mark ROCK'EM SOCK'EM for computer games and video games].July 19, 2007 - 10 AM: In re Harajuku Lovers, LLC, Serial No. 78544289 [Appeal… [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 12:57 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Honestly, Grits never thought this day would come.The City of Austin just approved a budget cutting more than $20 million from police, shifting functions totaling ~$80 million (including Internal Affairs, the 911 call center, and the forensics lab) out of the department, and committed to "re-imagining" how they spend another $50 million. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 1:10 pm
AASP Pela Associação dos Advogados de São Paulo (AASP), parte interessada no RE, falou Alberto Gosson Jorge Júnior. [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:05 pm
Em contra-razões, sustenta o Ministério Público do Estado de Minas Gerais que o RE não deve ser conhecido: por falta de prequestionamento do dispositivo legal que serviu de fundamento ao acórdão recorrido (súmulas 282 e 356 do STF); por assentar-se em mais de um fundamento e o RE não abrange todos eles (súmula 283 do STF) e, ainda, por estar a matéria envolta em circunstâncias de… [read post]