Search for: "J. S. Morales" Results 1161 - 1180 of 3,399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2011, 1:00 am by Máiréad Enright
Liam Leonard’sMoral Framing in Resource Disputes”. [read post]
26 May 2012, 7:23 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
Law and the Fake Picasso" pjblack.me/LPJvSR from @artsbeat: "Screening of Comedy 'The Anti-Semite' Is Canceled at Cannes" pjblack.me/LPHfeo there are ads on triple j's spotify app: "Triple J's Spotify conundrum" pjblack.me/KBl1K5 /via @joshgnosis "RIAA to Limewire: You Owe Us $72 Trillion" pjblack.me/LuH7uh #lwb486 #lws008 "Facebook Browser Is… [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am by Ted Max
”[16] Regarding the dilution by tarnishment claim asserted by Jack Daniels, the Supreme Court held that the Ninth Circuit erred by concluding that VIP’s use is noncommercial because it parodies and “convey[s] a humorous message” about Jack Daniels.[17] The Supreme Court noted that Section 1125(c)(3)(A)(ii)’s “fair use exclusion has its own exclusion: It does not apply when the use is ‘as a designation of source for the… [read post]
29 May 2009, 3:58 pm
La Forest J referred to it in the most important recent SCC judgment in this area of the law. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:00 am by Francis Pileggi
Prof. 201 (2016-2017)(Halaby Article); Note, Discriminatory Lawyers in a Discriminatory Bar, 40 Harvard J. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 1:28 pm by Jeff Gamso
I thought I was done with this piece of news for a while, but then along came Wesley J. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
(See for example: Ontario’s Child, Youth and Family Services Act at s 125(1), BC’s Child, Family and Community Service Act at s 13, Alberta’s Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act at s 1(2), Nova Scotia’s Children and Family Services Act at s 25(1), and Newfoundland’s Children, Youth and Families Act at s 10.) [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 4:33 pm by Jon Gelman
“In these arrests today, the defendants are accused of using fraud and deceit to undermine their legal and moral responsibilities, and I will use the resources of my office to relentlessly pursue anybody who abuses the system at the expense of honest, hard-working New Yorkers. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 1:53 pm by Thomas Surmanski
Through an analysis of previous cases and constitutional case law, Spies J. concluded that not only was s. 33.1 invalid as it infringes both s. 7 and s. 11(d) of the Charter and cannot be saved by s. 1 of the Charter, but also, it was already declared invalid by Wallace J in R. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 1:53 pm by Thomas Surmanski
Through an analysis of previous cases and constitutional case law, Spies J. concluded that not only was s. 33.1 invalid as it infringes both s. 7 and s. 11(d) of the Charter and cannot be saved by s. 1 of the Charter, but also, it was already declared invalid by Wallace J in R. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 2:42 am
 * Gilead triumphant as Court of Appealupholds Arnold J in Idenix's Sovaldi appealThe AmeriKat, who had been preoccupied of late with a treasure trove of litigation fun, summarised the “need-to-know” about the latest Gilead triumph in appeal. [read post]
In Indiana, for example, these were all swept away in 1935, as part of “An Act to Promote Public Morals. [read post]