Search for: "JONES v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,314
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
6 May 2019, 9:41 am
Both the Supreme Court in the seminal Reno v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 4:10 pm
In the Jones Case (2012) (United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Ars Technica), Google, GE join forces for green tech research, lobbying: (Ars Technica), AIPPI Congress: how to protect you IP rights in virtual worlds (Managing Intellectual Property), Industry still wary of ICANN plan for new top-level internet domains: (Intellectual Property Watch), Ubuntu-Firefox EULA dustup reignites OSS licensing debate: (Ars Technica), Media standard backers attempt Apple-less solo run: (Out-Law), Open Source in Mobile conference: OpenMoko CEO says embrace fragmentation,… [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm
By contrast, courts in California and Canada have found a contractual jurisdiction and applicable law clause invalid as a matter of public policy in order to allow a class action privacy claim to proceed against Facebook.[6] In England, the dual challenge of jurisdiction and collective actions in a mass privacy infringement claim has presented itself before the English Courts, first in Vidal-Hall v Google before the Court of Appeal in 2015[7] and in the Supreme Court judgment of… [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(Bell v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 9:00 pm
Jones & Laughlin. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 4:06 pm
IndiaHillson v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 7:50 am
Without dissent, the justices in Porter v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 5:12 pm
Co. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:46 am
Azzarello v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 1:11 am
Supreme Court's 2005 Granholm v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 5:00 am
The Minnesota Twin, Harry Blackmun, who would write Roe v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 6:05 am
Might be a tough project, but one that could pay real dividends.If you're thinking about case notes, I recommend a serious look at Jones v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:25 pm
Supreme Court Rules Against Routine Warrantless Blood Tests in DUI Cases: The Supreme Court ruled in our favor in Missouri v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
-Frankfort v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
-Frankfort v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
Jones. 1981. [read post]
