Search for: "John Doe #2" Results 1161 - 1180 of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2009, 1:30 am
However, the study does find that individual Courts of Appeals vary substantially in their levels of judicial activism. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
Does “whoever” imply a person, and not a machine? [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 4:50 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Case involving lawyers from Akin Gump or Howe & Russell (listed without regard to likelihood of being granted): Title: John v. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Evan Dicharry
” So does the Supreme Court of the United States have a legitimacy problem? [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:26 am
” The first prong of the inquiry under Section 2(e)(2), that the primary significance of the term in the mark sought to be registered is the name of a place generally known to the public, is not satisfied.And so the Board reversed the refusal.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Hat tip to FOB's John Egbert and Kevin Wilson, perennial Meet-the-Bloggers attendees.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
13 May 2019, 3:33 am
The Board affirmed a Section 2(e)(5) refusal of the container configuration shown below, for "milk," finding the design to be de jure functional under Section 2(e)(5). [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 10:04 am by Eugene Volokh
Though Jane Doe had consented to have sex with one of the boys (hereinafter John Doe II), she was unaware that two other boys (hereinafter John Doe III and John Doe IV) had switched places with Doe II. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:53 am by jlazarevic
Evidence linking Robinson to the crime was discovered when his DNA was mistakenly collected and entered into the state’s DNA database, which matched his profile with that of the suspect profile in the “John Doe” warrant. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 7:07 am
Jun 28, 2007) (NO. 6:05CV330) Judge: Leonard Davis / John LoveHolding: Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement GRANTEDPlaintiff filed objections to Judge Love's report and recommendation that the defendant's motion for summary judgment of noninfringement be granted, primarily arguing that: (1) an incorrect standard was applied in granting summary judgment of non-infringement, (2) the Report overlooks competent evidence that defeats summary judgment of… [read post]