Search for: "July 1, 2013 - July 2, 2013" Results 1161 - 1180 of 4,255
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2013, 3:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The criminal defendant was served with an Order to Remedy Violation on or about 12 July 2005 issued by A, the Deputy Zoning Administrator. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
  The compliance deadline was July 1, 2015.[1] All publicly traded banks with assets ≥ $50 billion had to additionally designate an executive as the CRO by January 1, 2015. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 3:50 pm by Cyrus Farivar
Police said Jay Matthew Riley, 21, of Woodbridge, Virginia, walked into Prince William’s Garfield District Station on July 1, 2013 to “inquire if he had any warrants on file for child pornography. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:30 am by John Day
-        Thomas files motion to dismiss any claims for damages on July 2, 2010. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 12:06 pm by Bill Marler
-Mar. 1999 Lettuce (iceberg) E. coliO157:H7 72 1:NE Oct. 1999 Salad E. coli O157:H7 92 3:OR, PA, OH Oct. 2000 Lettuce E. coli O157:H7 6 1:IN Nov. 2001 Lettuce E. coli O157:H7 20 1:TX July-Aug. 2002 Lettuce (romaine) E. coliO157:H7 29 2:WA, ID Nov. 2002 Lettuce E. coli O157:H7 13 1:Il Dec. 2002 Lettuce E. coli O157:H7 3 1:MN Oct. 2003-May 2004 Lettuce (mixed salad) E. coliO157:H7 57 1:CA Apr. 2004 Spinach E. coli O157:H7 16… [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 7:21 pm by Bill Marler
-Mar. 1999 Lettuce (iceberg) E. coliO157:H7 72 1:NE Oct. 1999 Salad E. coli O157:H7 92 3:OR, PA, OH Oct. 2000 Lettuce E. coli O157:H7 6 1:IN Nov. 2001 Lettuce E. coli O157:H7 20 1:TX July-Aug. 2002 Lettuce (romaine) E. coliO157:H7 29 2:WA, ID Nov. 2002 Lettuce E. coli O157:H7 13 1:Il Dec. 2002 Lettuce E. coli O157:H7 3 1:MN Oct. 2003-May 2004 Lettuce (mixed salad) E. coliO157:H7 57 1:CA Apr. 2004 Spinach E. coli O157:H7 16… [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 6:53 am by admin
Commissioner, 140 T.C. 1 (2013) in the Bosque Canyon Ranch case. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 6:53 am by admin
Commissioner, 140 T.C. 1 (2013) in the Bosque Canyon Ranch case. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Moreover the claim amended by the introduction of the disclaimer does not comply with the requirement of clarity pursuant to A 84. [12] Consequently, the Board is of the opinion that the amendment of claim 1 violates A 123(2). [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 9:24 am by Sarena
Snow White Must Die by Nele Neuhaus (audio book):  Riveting The Impossible Dead by Ian Rankin (audio book):  Methodical And that’s where I am as of July 25, 2013! [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 1:51 am by Laura Sandwell
R v Mackle (Nos. 1, 2 and 3), and R v McLaughlin, heard 11 – 12 December 2013. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
  We (the non-Dechert side) chastised the decision here, but that was only a reprise of our original 2013 critique, here – all of which remains valid.2. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 5:24 am by Patrick S. O'Donnell
For instance, Robert McChesney has noted the corresponding “decline and marginalization of…public service values,”[2] conspicuously evidenced in the precipitous decline of investigative journalism, hence the effort to address this void by an Internet-based non-profit journalistic endeavor like ProPublica. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 6:23 am by Matthew Weiss
 Subdivision (2) contains the “in motion” phrase that is discussed above. 1. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 2:09 am by Jeremy
 The reference was only made in July 2013, so the whole issue has been turned round in 18 months. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 3:16 pm by vpower
  The employee rate will be as follows: 2% at 62 Members July 1, 2014 – 8.15% July 1, 2015 – 8.56% July 1, 2016 – 9.205% 2% at 60 Members July 1, 2014 – 8.15% July 1, 2015 – 9.20% July 1, 2016 – 10.25% Of course, the member rate increases for current employees means that current employees will be paying a larger contribution towards… [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 10:18 am by Dan Antoun
On 12 July 2016 the Supreme Court heard the appeal of Moreno v The Motor Insurers’ Bureau. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm by Stephen Bilkis
On 17 July 1997, plaintiff (husband) and defendant (wife) got married. [read post]