Search for: "L.J.-I."
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,239
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2007, 5:20 pm
I've provided references for further reading and a deeper understanding. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 11:17 am
(See Ha, An Analysis in Critique of KIWA's Reform Efforts in the Los Angeles Korean-American Restaurant Industry (2001) 8 Asian L.J. 111, 122-123.) [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:34 am
Constitutional and Article I, Section 17 of the Florida Constitution, which prohibit cruel and unusual punishments. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:33 pm
Sriranga Veeraraghavan, Joint Infringement of Patent Claims: Advice for Patentees, 23 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech L.J. 211 (2006), [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 5:53 am
., drugs that have passed Phase I testing, current law bans access to an experimental drug on safety grounds until it has successfully completed all phases of testing.2007 WL 2238914, at *6.OK, we suppose that's right, but just exactly how relevant is it in this context? [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 5:56 am
, 54 Emory L.J. 461 (2005). [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 8:18 pm
Fox, An Anti-Monopoly Law for China — Scaling the Walls of Protectionist Government Restraints (published in the Antitrust L.J.) [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 12:39 am
In an article titled PANEL I: KSR V. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 4:03 pm
I did a quick search in Washington Practice. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 7:53 am
But to have crafted on occasion, something true and truly put-whatever the devil else legal scholarship is, is from, or is for, it's the joy of that too.from, Arthur Leff, 90 Yale L.J. 1296 (1980-81), which I located via HeinOnline, a specialized legal database available free at many libraries. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 10:39 pm
On the topic of formalism in my little corner of the world, I am re-reading "Contract Theory and the Limits of Contract Law" (113 Yale L.J. 541) by Alan Schwartz and Robert Scott, in which they make the argument, at least for business contracts, that business parties would choose Willistonian formalism over UCC-style contextualism as the mode of contract interpretation. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 1:30 pm
L.J. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 5:05 am
The best treatment of this subject is Arthur Allen Leff's Unspeakable Ethics, Unnatural Law, 1979 Duke L.J. 1229 (1979), which is, alas, not available online, even on Westlaw. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 10:00 am
I admit that Daniel Callahan has eloquently questioned the "research imperative," and perhaps his reasoning could be extended to health care more generally. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 1:17 pm
Dowd, Fathers and the Supreme Court: Founding Fathers and Nurturing Fathers, 54 EMORY L.J. 1271 (2005). [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
I Could Tell You Why What I'm Doing Is Legal But Then I'd Have To Shoot You (June 12, 2006)109. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 1:22 pm
Whether or not one buys into the whole wave metaphor (I myself think it misleads), what would a law informed by third-wave feminism look like? [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Katz, Unifying Disparate Treatment (Really), 59 Hastings L.J., Issue 3 (forthcoming Feb. 2008). [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 3:05 am
I recently blogged my essay, The Long Tail of Legal Scholarship, 116 Yale L.J. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Katz, Unifying Disparate Treatment (Really), 59 Hastings L.J., Issue 3 (forthcoming Feb. 2008). [read post]
