Search for: "LEE v STATE"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 5,094
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2019, 5:02 am
E.g., Matthews v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:14 am
(See Navarro Savings Ass’n v Lee, 446 U.S. 458, 461 [1980] [“a federal court must disregard nominal or formal parties and rest jurisdiction only upon the citizenship of real parties to the controversy”]). [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 12:01 pm
The first case, Mathena v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 3:59 am
Kansas v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 3:55 am
-area sniper Lee Boyd Malvo is asking the court to overturn his sentence of life without parole. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 10:04 am
Sniper pair, Lee Boyd Malvo. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
Briefly: At AP (via How Appealing), Roxana Hegeman reports on Kansas v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 9:11 pm
Sagaponack Realty, LLC v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Minnesota v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm
In 2012, in a case called Miller v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:52 am
” Commentary on one of the cases, Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:05 am
” In an op-ed for Newsweek, Isa Farrington Nichols, whose niece was murdered by convicted D.C. sniper Lee Boyd Malvo, weighs in on Mathena v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:28 am
The second witness is Jim Clampit, a Deputy in the Lee County Sheriff’s Office at the time of the murder, who Fennell made an alarming and inculpatory statement to at Stites’s funeral regarding Stites’s body. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
Specifically, Syed argued that the State failed to disclose potentially exculpatory evidence (a fax cover sheet disclaiming the reliability of the cell phone records), which violated the State’s duty imposed by Brady v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:26 am
Haan, Washington and Lee University – School of Law. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:01 am
Lee. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
SHIREY V. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 2:10 am
A Patent-Eligible Diagnostic Method Claim One PTAB decision that reversed the examiner and found diagnostic method claims eligible for patenting under § 101 is In re Lee, Appeal 2017-011014 (Jan. 14, 2019). [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
” XClusive-Lee, Inc. v. [read post]
