Search for: "Likely v. State"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 82,216
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2023, 2:45 pm
In Abitron Austria GmbH, et al., v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:31 am
District Judge Bolton enjoined enforcement of various provisions, a decision later upheld by the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 12:45 pm
In a string of decisions from Underhill v. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 3:44 pm
This past week the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Michigan v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 1:32 pm
In my blogging this month, I will likely focus on some interesting criminal procedure cases pending in the Supreme Court this Term.... [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:18 pm
Various people indicated that the most likely person to have done this was Mr. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 4:32 am
Brown v. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 9:44 am
Zynga Game Network, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:22 pm
Explanations for why federal courts sometimes treat the private actions of private parties as public actions subject to the Constitution, like the Supreme Court did in Shelley v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 6:17 am
Fall is back, and, in the United States, that means pumpkin-flavored products and (American) football galore. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 1:54 pm
And State v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 4:59 am
As the 8th District’s decision a couple weeks ago in State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 7:20 am
In recent years, the Republic of Turkey has displayed a dedication to preserving and repatriating its cultural artifacts and antiquities to be kept by the state.[1] In what the nation itself calls a “cultural war,” Turkey has engaged with countries like the United States, Australia, the United Arab Emirates, Germany, and more […] [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 12:36 pm
. [* * *] California Restriction on Gun Ads That "Reasonably Appear[] to Be Attractive to Minors" Likely Unconstitutional From Junior Sports Magazines, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 5:17 am
Background: In Brackeen v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 11:01 pm
Hood seemed hopelessly out of his element talking about, well, just about anything you would expect him to know about, but especially the Renfroe v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 8:08 pm
Washington State Republican Party, No. 06-713, and State of Washington v. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 9:08 am
In Cantrell v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:05 pm
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) April 22, 2014 Sotomayor mantra "Race matters" likely to thrill some readers, but it's… imprecise (all 9 Justices agree race matters, disagree on how) — Walter Olson (@walterolson) April 22, 2014 Plurality cites 1 of my least fave SCOTUS cases, Reitman v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 5:42 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
