Search for: "London v. State"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 4,150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2024, 8:56 am
He stated: “In my view the father’s presentation before me was sensible, honest and reliable…. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 1:41 am
Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v State Ins. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 8:47 am
In cases such as Kelo v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am
On 13 October 2023, Mr Justice Julian Knowles handed down judgement in Aaronson v Stones [2023] EWHC 2399 (KB). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:07 pm
The Secretary of State only withdrew her decision to exclude him from the UK when she was granted permission to make a control order against him, which was later modified to prevent him from contacting extremist affiliates in London by moving him to an address in the Midlands. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:50 am
LLC v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 11:19 am
NRAM plc v X [Name redacted by request]. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:29 pm
Boreh v London Borough of Ealing [2008] EWCA Civ 1176 was an appeal from a s.204 appeal of a s.202 review that upheld a finding that a property offered in discharge of s.192(3) duty was suitable. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 10:40 am
SH, R (on the application of) v The London Borough of Waltham Forest (2019) EWHC 2618 (Admin) This was a judicial review of Waltham Forest’s decision that it had discharged its s.193 Housing Act 1996 duty (the full homeless duty) to Ms SH by an offer of private sector accommodation under s.193(7AA). [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 3:24 am
In March this year the Admiralty Court in London handed down its judgment in respect of a collision between “Alexandra 1” (“A1”) and “Ever Smart” (“ES”) (see: Nautical Challenge Ltd v Evergreen Marine (UK) Ltd [2017] EWHC 453 (Admlty)). [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 12:01 am
Fifth Circuit holds Severance v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 1:14 pm
City of New London. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 3:04 pm
Belgian State, of February 11th, 2005). [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 3:06 pm
This requirement was stated to be independent of national law. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:16 am
Child Poverty Action Group v Secretary of State for Work & Pensions [2011] EWHC 2616 (Admin) – Read judgment On 13 October 2011 Mr Justice Supperstone in the High Court held that changes to rules for calculating housing benefit were lawful and in particular did not breach equality legislation. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 9:58 pm
Rptr.2d 535 (2001)(right to recoupment) with Excess Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 4:10 am
This Kat recently had an opportunity revisit the patent decision given by the United States Supreme Court on 20 March in Mayo Collaborative Services v Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 1:04 pm
Leasing, LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:11 pm
Wandsworth backed away from that case, but the view of some, including me, at the time, was that the terms were effectively a personal obligation, not a term of the tenancy.We have just heard about a County Court judgment in a case, LB Wandsworth v Maggott, in Wandsworth County Court, where exactly that was held. [read post]
