Search for: "Long v. United States"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 21,077
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2007, 8:02 am
Earlier this week, the qui tam case of United States ex. rel.Louanne Boothe v. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 9:13 am
In Shurtleff v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:41 pm
[It should be clear, incidentally, that Burns violated the law by fleeing his confinement as a slave, and the august Supreme Court, in the worst single decision in our history, worse even than Dred Scott, upheld the Fugitive Slave Law of 1893 in Prigg v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 5:51 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 1:09 pm
In Reed v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 11:25 am
For instance, the dangers that the Equal Protection Clause were intended to address reared their ugly head in the Old South after the disastrous 1876 decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
Relatives . . . well . . . come to think of it, relatives are better.But in United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 6:41 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 2:45 pm
United States, 2008 WL 2229495 (6th Cir. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 3:50 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 7:28 am
Further, since the United States Supreme Court decided State Farm Mut. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 1:10 pm
The Oyster Case: Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
L.R. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:08 am
By Bradley Graveline and Jennifer Driscoll-Chippendale On June 17, 2013, the United States Supreme Court announced a rule that blurs the lines between antitrust and patent law in the context of Hatch-Waxman litigation. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 8:09 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:58 am
United States, the true threats case argued on December 1. [read post]
27 May 2015, 6:24 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 4:15 am
In a pending case, the Federal Circuit is primed to provide much-needed clarity on the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement at the United States International Trade Commission (ITC). [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
Today, the Second Circuit (2-1) issued its long-awaited opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 9:00 am
This rule is in response to United States v. [read post]
