Search for: "M. B.1."
Results 1161 - 1180
of 13,692
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2014, 2:10 pm
” That answers my initial puzzlement about this decision, given that s.204 provides: (1)If an applicant who has requested a review under section 202— (a)is dissatisfied with the decision on the review, or (b)is not notified of the decision on the review within the time prescribed under section 203,he may appeal to the county court on any point of law arising from the decision or, as the case may be, the original decision. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 2:10 pm
” That answers my initial puzzlement about this decision, given that s.204 provides: (1)If an applicant who has requested a review under section 202— (a)is dissatisfied with the decision on the review, or (b)is not notified of the decision on the review within the time prescribed under section 203,he may appeal to the county court on any point of law arising from the decision or, as the case may be, the original decision. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 12:46 pm
Only the following nonimmigrant categories are subject to the residence abroad requirement: B, F, H (except H-1), J, M, O-2, P and Q. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 8:28 am
FAR 52.101(b) (also known as “48 C.F.R. 52.101(b)”) explains the numbering system for FAR clauses: (b) Numbering – (1) FAR provisions and clauses. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 7:37 am
USA, 317 F.3d 1097 (9th Cir. 2003), holds that Rule 9(b) can apply to either all of a claim or part of it, under three circumstances: (1) if fraud is an element of the claim; (2) if fraud isn’t an element, but the plaintiff nonetheless “allege[s] a unified course of fraudulent conduct and rel[ies] entirely on that course of conduct as the basis of a claim,” Rule 9(b) applies to “the pleading of that claim as a whole”; (3) if the… [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm
Courts see statute as providing blanket immunity and also b/c of 512(m). [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 1:26 pm
Author: Julianna M. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
Smith Today, 20 First Amendment Law Review (2022).John M. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:55 pm
In the FTC's Example #5, A is the advertiser and B is the blogger. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 8:01 pm
Se você mora em uma região quente do país, um chuveiro A ou B ou C é suficiente para aquecer a água. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 9:34 pm
Básicamente, de la soberbia y egolatría de nuestros funcionarios. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 8:00 am
I’m not sure how this will play out this year. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 1:30 pm
§1.704-1(b)(2)(iv)(f), regardless of whether capital accounts were adjusted for that event. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 7:25 am
(1 of 2). [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 8:17 am
State, 2013 WY 98, 307 P.3d 860 (Wyo. 2013).)Issues: 1) Did the district court abuse its discretion when it determined that testimony regarding previous violence in the appellant’s relationship with the victim was admissible under W.R.E. 404(b)? [read post]
23 May 2020, 1:43 pm
Still, it is something to consider.By Lawrence M. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 7:27 am
Practice Tip #1: When Congress passed the Cable Communication Act, a statute of limitations was not included. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
"Lisa M. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 10:00 pm
La Chambre fait remarquer qu'un tel raisonnement ne prend pas suffisamment en compte l'information apportée par la demande antérieure qui s'intéresse en premier lieu à procurer des sources indépendantes.L'homme du métier, en voulant améliorer l'invention, peut réaliser que l'effet voulu pouvait réaliser que la caractéristique B était suffisante pour obtenir l'effet voulu. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:02 pm
§ 636(b)(1) (emphasis added). [read post]
