Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 5,813
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Insureds who are sued and successfully defended by their insurer may be able to obtain double costs.
28 Jan 2011, 3:58 pm
Burnyeat J.The defendants applied for an order for double costs pursuant to 9-1(1)(c) and 9-1(5)(b) and 14-1(1) of the Rules following the trial of the matter which commenced on May 31, 2010. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:41 am
Appx. 185, 187 (9th Cir. 2010) (Ikuta, J., concurring); United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:53 am
Cir. 2009)(Prost, J.). [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 12:47 am
Beach J set aside the decision of the Deputy Commissioner and has remitted the matter to the Deputy Commissioner to be determined in accordance with the Court’s judgment. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 4:54 am
In his view *it was clear from the Patents Act 1977 s.7(2) that a patentable invention was "property" and that the inventor was the first owner of that property unless one of the circumstances mentioned in s.7(2)(b) applied;* if s.7(2)(b) did apply, so that another person was entitled to the whole of the property in the invention before it was made, that other person was then entitled to apply for and be granted a patent, and if the inventor assigned the property in the… [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 6:20 pm
Pierson, Debora J. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 10:13 am
Additionally, Items 4(k) and 5(b) of Part IV on Schedule H and Item 4(j) of Part II on Schedule I ask if any assets were transferred to another plan. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 10:13 am
Additionally, Items 4(k) and 5(b) of Part IV on Schedule H and Item 4(j) of Part II on Schedule I ask if any assets were transferred to another plan. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 10:13 am
Additionally, Items 4(k) and 5(b) of Part IV on Schedule H and Item 4(j) of Part II on Schedule I ask if any assets were transferred to another plan. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
(b) Approved forms.(1) Contested actions. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
(b) Approved forms.(1) Contested actions. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:50 am
Charge two alleged that the respondent neglected a legal matter entrusted to him, in violation of rule 1.3(b) of the Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR 1200.0), as follows: Beginning in or about 2009, the respondent represented Louis Wenger (hereinafter Wenger) in two related judicial dissolution proceedings commenced by Wenger’s son, David Wenger (hereinafter David), entitled David Wenger v L.A. [read post]
31 May 2012, 10:55 am
The defendant, Robert J. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 10:04 am
" In Christi J. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:15 am
Vice Chancellor J. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 5:03 pm
Throughout his distinguished career, Machtinger resolved a plethora of challenging tax conflicts and steadily guided clients through a variety of trust and estate matters. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 7:11 am
Ga. 2012)(J. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 2:45 am
Hilson and Mario J. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 3:41 pm
unfinished works are sufficiently "fixed" to be copyrightable subject matter;4. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:42 am
The plaintiff alleged that GEICO had breached the insurance contract by previously applying the Household Exclusion and denying the plaintiff's claims back on September 19, 2014.Judge Gerald J. [read post]
