Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P" Results 1161 - 1180 of 5,342
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” Among its provisions, the bill, “[p]rohibits third-parties—including voter engagement organizations—from collecting absentee ballot applications,” “[i]nvalidates ballots cast by lawful voters before 5:00 p.m. in a precinct other than the one to which they were assigned, regardless of the reason or their ability to travel to another location,” and “[b]ans mobile polling places. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  We ask “is this IP right invalid b/c it’s too broad” and “is the thing D is doing sufficiently similar to what P is doing” but generally not in an integrated proceeding “is the thing D is doing that P is doing the thing that can be controlled under this right? [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
” (p. 31) Certainly by the time of the Renaissance, it was an established attribute of international trade. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 5:48 am by admin
I say §1363.03(b) does not apply to any other situation. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 6:20 am by Richard Hunt
Looking at the record this doesn’t seem plausible, but perhaps that doesn’t matter. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 9:11 am by admin
The court found that: (a) Plaintiff’s complaint failed to establish the elements for an adverse possession claim because there was no evidence of actual occupation of the land on Defendant’s property; (b) a portion of a building being erected on one’s land and projecting over the adjoining land of a neighbor fails to show hostility; (c) there was no indication that possession of the areas under and between the chimneys was under any claim of right; and, (d) it did not… [read post]
30 May 2012, 2:49 pm by Tara Mospan
§§ 408(b)(3), §401(a)(9), but it is not clear how the amount of withdrawals would be calculated because the traditional actuarial mortality charts would not apply. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 9:47 pm by Eric E. Johnson
If silencing critics with lawsuits doesn’t work, then governing in accordance with the will of the electorate is the plan B. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 2:44 am by Ben Vernia
Whether or not the United States intervenes, the relator can’t dismiss the suit without permission of the United States and the court, see § 3730(b)(1). [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 5:16 am by admin
Best of all, the client a) can budget for the case, b) stays informed and involved, and c)knows that the cash register doesn’t start running whenever they ask a question. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm by David Kopel
The following contribution to our post-decision symposium on the health care cases is written by David B. [read post]