Search for: "MUSIC v. STATE"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 4,606
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2008, 6:56 pm
Having the state Supreme Court agree to take up the matter is a victory of a sort, I guess, but is kind of like standing in the charred, smoking remains of your burned-up house and finding that the box with your award ribbons from sixth grade music camp made it unharmed. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 3:33 pm
an educationalperspective - intro to web 2.0PrivacyBig Brother State - privacy & surveillanceThe Last Enemy extract - life as an un person in an ID card worldACLU pizza delivery - private/public data collection and privacyIP4chords (Axis of Awesome) - creativity, mash ups, copyright, parodyFilesharing RIAA parody ad (IT Crowd) - filesharing and P2P3 minute medley on the music wars(from TED)Content and tubesThe Internet is For Porn - self explanatoryNet Neutrality,… [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:44 am
" Maxwell v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:37 am
Earth, Wind & Fire IP, LLC v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 10:29 pm
" In 1802, "prints" were added (2 Stat. 171); in 1831 "musical compositions" were added (4 Stat. 436); in 1856 "dramatic compositions" were added (11 Stat. 138); and in 1856 "photographs" were added (13 Stat. 540).The primary issue addressed by the United States Supreme Court in 1884 was whether "Congress had the constitutional right to protect photographs and negatives thereof by copyright. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 1:05 pm
The ruling came in Lenz v. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Herbalife issued the following statement: Today's decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the FTC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 5:11 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
The case deals with two difficult and very interesting questions, the first being whether an ISP can be held liable for infringing activities of its subscribers, more precisely the up- and down-loading of copyright-protected musical works in the BitTorrent-Network. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 6:40 pm
Bridgeport Music, Inc. and Southfield Music, Inc. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am
Sony Music Entertainment, et al., No. 15-1518 (Claim construction in IPRs – pro se case) Interference: Edward Tobinick v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 8:40 am
US v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 11:07 am
., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
This is also typically where courts will consider whether the copying is de minimis — too trifling for the law to be concerned with.2 That is what the Middle District Court of Tennessee did in Bridgeport Music v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:14 pm
Citing Anderson v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 4:21 am
The court begins its discussion by stating that “Transformation almost always occurs when the new work ‘does something more than repackage or republish the original copyrighted work. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 9:11 pm
I thought I’d post some excerpts from a paper that I co-wrote for a presentation I gave with a friend of mine at the State Bar of Texas’ 16th Annual Entertainment Law Institute entitled “Legal & Business Aspects of Music, Film and Digital Entertainment” in October 2006. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 10:16 am
Kahle from 2006 as the plaintiff in Kahle v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
. — F.Supp.2d —-, 2007 WL 43747 (S.D.Ohio) United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm
” (Elonis v United States, 16). [read post]
