Search for: "Majors v. Majors" Results 1161 - 1180 of 55,276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2017, 9:37 pm
" And online at The Atlantic, law professor Garrett Epps has an essay titled "A Major Church-State Ruling That Shouldn't Have Happened: In Trinity v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 7:00 am by Legal Profession
Justice Workman has filed her dissent: Neither the sheer length of the majority's opinion, nor the large number of cases cited (but erroneously applied), nor even its expansive conclusory statements, can obfuscate its lack of sound legal reasoning and its... [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 2:40 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On appeal from: 2013 EWCA Crim 1104 The Supreme Court, by a majority of 3:2, allowed the appeal concerning whether VAT, paid or accounted for to HMRC, should be discounted when calculating the benefit figure to be confiscated under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 12:26 pm
Scott (Columbia University - Law School) have posted Hoffman v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 6:41 pm
A lot’s been written about the High Court’s recent decision in Baze v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:29 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Giving the majority judgment Lord Clarke stated that S & Marper was concerned only with the position of suspected but non-convicted persons, not convicted persons. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 12:13 pm by Jill Gross
 I am posting today to provide a few more details of the case and … Continue reading More on DirectTV v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:54 pm by zshapiro
Besides Alito’s plurality decision in McDonald v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 2:34 pm
Earlier today, the Eighth Circuit ruled against Major League Baseball in the high-profile fantasy baseball case of CBC Distribution and Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 12:21 pm
Back in 2005, Judge Betty Fletcher (who wrote the majority opinion) and Judge Bea (who wrote the dissent) got into an unusually nasty exchange, about which I commented here. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 8:30 am by Bankruptcy Prof
The Supreme Court has ruled, 6-3, majority opinion by Clarence Thomas, that the debtor exempts only a dollar interest in property, not the actual property itself and the trustee can sell the property after the objection period has expired. [read post]