Search for: "Mark v. Wish"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 2,180
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2015, 4:26 am
Farmgirl Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 6:15 am
She relies on the principle established in Vinos v Marks and Spencer PLC [2000] 3 All ER 784. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 6:45 am
”In its 2019 Bucklew v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:46 am
In Impression Products Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:46 am
In Impression Products Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 8:29 am
LEXIS 8249, at *9 (internal markings omitted). [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:43 am
Emma QC has been involved in some of the IPKat's favourite legal disputes, including Interflora v Marks & Spencer, Matratzen Concord v Hukla and one case which, in this Kat's opinion, should never have been allowed to go to court, Reed v Reed. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 2:44 am
The plaintiff in Carnivale v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 12:01 am
See Lingle v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:00 am
The decision in Shurtleff v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 3:15 am
Bragg Creek v Tyco Integrated 2019 ABQB 226 https://t.co/zZ0mEsFTxp 2019-04-05 Letter to the Copyright Office on IT modernization status in light of the Fourth Estate decision https://t.co/uF1oGnu5Qk 2019-04-05 Case Law: Stocker v Stocker, Supreme Court overturns Judge on meaning of “tried to strangle” https://t.co/YOOlp3CNSc 2019-04-05 Open Banking & Data Ownership https://t.co/gLrAvzpLjW 2019-04-05 Blogger’s Screenshot of a Newspaper Page Qualifies as Fair… [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
Apart from the fact that that leaves only eight months in which to get Faith Partnership Charters up and running, what happens if a local council does not wish to get involved with its “places of worship”? [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:42 pm
Assn. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 6:21 am
Malleiro v. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 3:55 pm
From Stubbs v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 12:52 pm
Auriga Capital Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 3:48 pm
The bill was inspired by the contrary holding in Rope v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:09 am
Section 3 of the Trade Marks Act provides, inter alia, that “The name … of another may not be included in a trade mark”. [read post]