Search for: "Michigan v. United States"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 3,728
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2006, 6:14 am
The decision in Murphy, which the Court recently reaffirmed in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 2:41 pm
The dissenting judge stated that “nothing in the complaint gives federal judges the power to oversee Detroit’s schools in the name of the United States Constitution. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 6:40 pm
Defendant Davist appeals from his sentence for false claims against the United States, conspiracy to defraud the United States, and false statements. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:20 am
Neumann’s custodial rights under Mexican law when she took her children to the United States on December 28, 2014. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:27 am
No. 11-1391 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit No. 2:10-cv-10137—Gerald E. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 3:33 pm
Michigan Asphalt Paving: The United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:04 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 2:03 am
However, this testimony was allowed and the court no doubt invoked Michigan v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 1:44 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 1:12 pm
S. 103 , and United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 10:01 am
Growth v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:39 am
"
United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 8:07 am
Further Reading: Opinion: Brown v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 5:43 am
He then cited to some of the landmark cases involving homosexuality such as Bowers v Hardwick [the 1986 case that upheld Georgia's criminalization of certain homosexual acts]; Lawrence v Texas [the 2003 decision overruling Bowers]; and of course, United States v Windsor [striking down as unconstitutional the federal Defense of Marriage Act which defined a marriage as solely between one man and one woman in the federal benefits context].Justice… [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 6:44 pm
In the United State Supreme Court, the State’s counsel, Joesph Maziarz, placed great emphasis on the fact that Belton was settled precedent and the need for a clear, bright-line rule. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:17 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 11:23 am
App. 2003); United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 8:47 pm
The church asserts that God hates gays, and is punishing America for its tolerance of gays; particularly in the United States military. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:44 pm
Microsoft Corp. v. z4 Tech. [read post]
