Search for: "Mr. X" Results 1161 - 1180 of 2,306
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 12:17 pm by Florian Mueller
One judge said this to Samsung's counsel:"Why do you think that testimony that customers would pay X amount more for particular features ... why that isn't a pretty good proxy for demand driver? [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:22 am by Benjamin Wittes
In other words, the NSA is allowed—in deciding whether or not it can target Person X—to acquire communications “about” Person X, but only by acquiring communications of a party who is himself reasonably believed to be overseas. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 3:35 pm by SJM
Rousk v Sweden [2013] ECHR 746 (25/7/13) Mr R was the director of a company who, between 2002 and 2003, ran up income tax debts in the region of 27000 EUR. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 3:35 pm by SJM
Thirdly, it followed that the State had failed to protect B’s physical and psychological integrity and that there had been a violation of the positive duty under Article 8 (applying X & Y v Netherlands). [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 3:35 pm by SJM
Thirdly, it followed that the State had failed to protect B’s physical and psychological integrity and that there had been a violation of the positive duty under Article 8 (applying X & Y v Netherlands). [read post]
The Facts In October 2011, the High Court ruled that Mrs Prest (“W”) was entitled to a divorce settlement of £17.5 million from Mr Prest (“H”), a wealthy oil trader. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]