Search for: "NEW JERSEY v. UNITED STATES" Results 1161 - 1180 of 3,520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2012, 5:37 am by Greg Mersol
Lockheed Martin Corp., Case No. 08-6292 (RBK/AMD) (Dec. 14, 2011), the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey addressed the sex discrimination claims of a much smaller class of 17,000 women in a case claiming gender discrimination in promotions and compensation. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 3:56 pm by Pennsylvania Employment Lawyer
 There Is No Federal Drug Testing Law for Private Employers in the United StatesCheck Your State - and Check With Counsel! [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 12:00 am by David Hartley
Oct. 10, 2017), the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denied both Princeton Ophthalmic (“Plaintiff’s”) partial motion for summary judgment as to the first and third elements of section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rule 10(b)(5) promulgated thereunder and Corinthian Ophthalmic, board members Drs. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 7:45 am
  They registered as domestic partners in New Jersey in 2003 when that state's DP law went into effect (prior to the enactment of the more recent Civil Union Act), but neither man applied for asylum in the U.S. within a year of entry. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 8:04 am by Adam Schlossman
New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection (10-388) with a written statement from Justice Alito respecting the denial. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:55 am by Jonathan I. Nirenberg
Onward Search, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey refused to dismiss most of Mr. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 6:50 am by Smith Eibeler LLC
The United States Supreme Court has ruled against a gay couple in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to bake a wedding cake for their wedding in the case Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:50 am by Smith Eibeler LLC
The United States Supreme Court has ruled against a gay couple in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to bake a wedding cake for their wedding in the case Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
The United States District Court for the Central District of California recently granted a plaintiff’s motion to strike portions of the defendant’s expert report for the untimely disclosure of new invalidity theories that were not previously disclosed in the defendant’s invalidity contentions. [read post]
The United States District Court for the Central District of California recently granted a plaintiff’s motion to strike portions of the defendant’s expert report for the untimely disclosure of new invalidity theories that were not previously disclosed in the defendant’s invalidity contentions. [read post]
The United States District Court for the Central District of California recently granted a plaintiff’s motion to strike portions of the defendant’s expert report for the untimely disclosure of new invalidity theories that were not previously disclosed in the defendant’s invalidity contentions. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 11:54 am
The United States Supreme Court's decision in Thompson is similar to the New Jersey Supreme Court's 1995 ruling in Craig v. [read post]