Search for: "P V Holding Corporation" Results 1161 - 1180 of 1,781
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
The Court appears to be holding Derry v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
In Jivraj v Hashwani [2011] UKSC 40, [2011] All ER (D) 246 (Jul), the Supreme Court heard its second arbitration case, after Dallah Real Estate v Pakistan [2010] UKSC 46, [2011] 1 All ER 485 reported previously in these pages (see NLJ, 21 January 2011, p 104). [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
In Jivraj v Hashwani [2011] UKSC 40, [2011] All ER (D) 246 (Jul), the Supreme Court heard its second arbitration case, after Dallah Real Estate v Pakistan [2010] UKSC 46, [2011] 1 All ER 485 reported previously in these pages (see NLJ, 21 January 2011, p 104). [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm by Kiera Flynn
P. 60(b)(6); (4) whether a reasonable jurist could believe that the Texas Attorney General made material misrepresentations that constitute a fraud on the court; and (5) whether imposition of the death penalty in this case was arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm by John Elwood
I didn’t have it in me to do the “holds” from Monday’s colossal order list; the “hold watch” aspect of this feature will (probably) return next week. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 5:15 am by Rob Robinson
Company Faces Sanctions Over Failed Litigation Hold - http://bit.ly/oNeOUa (Mary Pat Gallagher) N.Y. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 6:13 am
 The vindication of rights argument often is based on Green Tree Financial Corporation-Alabama v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:35 am by Marie Louise
(IPBiz)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC reverses DNH in Markem-Imaje Corporation v Zipher; Newman partially dissents (IPBiz) District Court Nevada: Plaintiff need not produce licenses involving unasserted patents where licenses involving patents-in-suit have been produced: Bally Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 1:30 pm by Robert Tanha
Indeed, at the very minimum, he would be required, under the rule in Wilson v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 4:43 am by Larry Ribstein
On Friday the Delaware Supreme Court decided the important case of CML V, LLC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 3:03 am by Michael Kang, guest-blogger
Most of the excitement about Citizens United revolved around the role of corporations in political campaigning, but the effect of the decision’s specific holding in terms of promoting corporate spending on campaign speech was likely not to be very large. [read post]