Search for: "Parcell v. State" Results 1161 - 1180 of 1,744
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
At least since Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 10:00 pm by Patricia Salkin
In 2013, the Macks received an Enforcement Order from the City stating that the storage of large vehicles at the 61st Street Property violated the City’s zoning code, and an Enforcement Order from the City stating that the Smokey Hill Property was an inappropriate residential use and occupancy of a building on a parcel of land zoned for General Commercial use. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 10:53 am by Miriam Seifter
The question presented in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 4:19 am
Tam, the Board struck down the "disparagement" provision and in Ianco v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:47 am by Lyle Denniston
  The owners of 31 of the parcels, however, chose to pay the full amount at the outset. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:01 pm by John Elwood
United Parcel Service 12-1226Issue: Whether, and in what circumstances, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:41 pm by Theodore T. Eidukas
The employee in the case was a part-time driver for United Parcel Service of America, Inc. [read post]