Search for: "People v David S." Results 1161 - 1180 of 5,856
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
The "predictor" is no longer there, but the link gives us the text:Due to the effects of the Federal Circuit's en banc Phillips v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 10:45 am by David Post
The statute will — and is designed to — constrain people from communicating with other people in certain specified ways. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr notes that the Supreme Court’s high-profile partisan-gerrymandering case, Gill v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
(Remember Justice Sotomayor’s suggestion that a “wise Latina” may bring different positive things to the job than other capable people do.) [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 3:26 pm by Ron Coleman
It’s a nice example of the adage that “if you repeat something often enough, people will believe it’s true. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 7:13 am by Adam Chandler
Meanwhile, yesterday’s argument in the Sixth Amendment case Harrington v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 10:25 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Index No. 150051/2010), precipitated by the comic's remarks in 2007 on The David Letterman Show and E! [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 11:58 am by Victoria Clark
Harry Graver summarized the Supreme Court’s ruling in Ortiz v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 6:02 pm by Hannah Diaz
After welcoming everyone to the event, EFF's Cindy Cohn began the evening's activities by introducing our intrepid Quiz Master Kurt Opsahl, and our judges Alex Moss, Andrew Crocker, and David Greene. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:10 pm
Zeininger´s defense argued that the Constitution´s Sixth Amendment gives people the right to cross-examine the witnesses against them and also referred to a United States Supreme Court case, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]