Search for: "People v Justice A."
Results 1161 - 1180
of 22,965
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2007, 12:14 pm
(Justice Moreno's brief concurrence on this point is worth reading, by the way.) [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 7:24 am
"San Francisco, which spent over $672 million during the last fiscal year to provide shelter and housing to people experiencing homelessness, told the justices in a 'friend of the court' brief that its inability to enforce its own laws 'has made it more difficult to provide services' to those people.... [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Town of Greece v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:48 am
The announcement that the justices had granted review in Moody v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:27 am
The Department of Justice has recently filed its brief in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:53 pm
He mentioned that he had joined Justice Barrett's opinion in Does v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:54 am
On one side, you had a former United States Supreme Court justice; on the other, you had a wealthy political benefactor/beneficiary — imagine if a case called Stephen Breyer v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 1:01 pm
Wednesday morning the justices got a rare opportunity to ponder basic principles of tort law, as they closed the October session with the argument in Air and Liquid Systems v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
Here are a few preliminary thoughts about the Court’s decision yesterday in Trump v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 8:27 am
The first, Atkins v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:55 pm
"Which reminded Justice Aaronson of a hypothetical that Justice Mosk authored in the NYU Law Review:"Judge: I sentence you to 200 years in state prison. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 10:51 am
I'd have preferred Justice Mihara to simply disagree with the other case. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 12:50 pm
And Justice Rushing does a great job explaining why this condition is overbroad. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 2:45 pm
Justice Rushing provides an outstanding answer. [read post]
31 May 2007, 1:15 pm
Justice Morrison thinks -- indeed, holds -- that it's permissible to introduce the closing argument into evidence. [read post]
6 May 2008, 12:57 pm
Reasonable minds might disagree about such a conclusion, but it seems a rational one, and Justice Robie's presentation of the issue is very persuasive. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 11:27 am
Justice Moreno, joined by Justices Kennard and Werdegar, dissent.Lest my (necessarily abbreviated) description suffice, here's the basic point of the dissent: "Stripped to its essence, what the majority holds is that the challenge 'Where are you from? [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 12:39 pm
Thanks, Justice Benke. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:55 am
By contrast, Justice Mihara dissents, and writes a 27-page dissent of his own. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 1:09 am
" By contrast, Justice Wiseman says, dissenting in part: "These facts do not prove, however, that the threat conveyed an immediate prospect of execution, as required by section 422. [read post]
