Search for: "People v Peters"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 2,137
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
If this seems too bleak a view of the Court, consider that this is exactly what the Court did in Vega v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 9:00 am
(For the views of one very distinguished administrative law professor who disagrees with my assessment of the OLC opinion, see Peter Schuck’s op-edin the NYT.) [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 7:38 am
Peter Pan: removing Tiger Song (?). [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm
Peter Karol, What’s the Use: The Structural Flaw Undermining Warhol v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am
PCC staff are available at all times to advise members of the public further, and to offer practical, immediate assistance.” Since last week’s round up there are a number of “resolved” PCC complaints to report: Mr Julian Assange v The Observer The Observer, clause 1, 09/03/2012; Mrs Christine Hemming v Sunday Mercury, clause 1, 08/03/2012; Mrs Carol Mlatem v South Wales Argus, clause 3, 08/03/2012; Ms Pamela Fenton v Sunday Mail, clause 1,… [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm
ASA had a news “Consultation on new strengthened rules and guidance for gambling ads to protect children and young people”. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 11:33 am
In Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 7:23 am
The American University Law Review's 2009 Symposium commemorated the 40th anniversary of Tinker v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:17 am
The jiplp weblog carries a crisp, clear account by Peter Jabaly of the US decision in Air-Freshner v Paul Getty and the limited utility of fair use defences in trade mark infringement proceedings. [read post]
10 May 2015, 7:34 am
In all, four people were injured in the crash, including the man’s son. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 3:31 pm
(His arguments from NFIB v. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 3:53 pm
Medwed;Anatomy of a Miscarriage of Justice: The Wrongful Conviction of Peter J. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 12:36 pm
Chapter V explores sports issues in private litigation, including standing, class actions, injunctions, and damages. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 9:10 pm
It's really, really hard to cross-examine a transcript, which is why those robed people in D.C. bothered to decide Crawford v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 4:35 pm
(See, e.g., Liparota v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
A more thoughtful analysis was offered by commentators such as Camila Batmanghelidjh (founder of the charities The Place To Be and Kids Company) in The Independent and Peter Oborne in The Telegraph. [read post]
24 May 2012, 3:42 am
Also, Trevor Potter wrapped up with an assessment of the DC Circuit Court decision on the Van Hollen v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:45 am
New trialR. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 3:36 am
District Judge Peter Ward told him: “People who answer their phones in court will go to the cells. [read post]
