Search for: "People v. Lee"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,795
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
On 1 November 2023, the Supreme Court of British Columbia dismissed the claimant’s defamation claim in Lee v Black, 2023 BCSC 1920 as being without any basis in fact. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 9:18 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
Our final relist comes from a state that always avoids judicial controversy: Freddie Lee Hall v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
Rev __ (2018 Forthcoming), Eumi Lee, University of California Hastings College of the Law. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
The company was fined for taking more than 20 billion images of people in the UK found online and on social media to feed its facial recognition database. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
The UK GDPR has previously been successful in suing people who may have undesirable/compromising information about an someone on their device. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 2:34 pm
The total rents from patents are larger than the total costs; similarly true for university patent licensing income v. costs overall, even w/a lot of losers. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:25 pm
The jury never saw the V-Plot video. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:59 am
They’re not missing an “a” and a “v” here or there? [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 10:48 am
Based on the Harper Lee novel. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm
Quashing multiple defamation proceedings initiated against media the judge said public servants and constitutional functionaries must be able to face criticism since they owed a solemn duty to the people. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 5:38 am
And I've had my “Law & the Civil Rights Movement” students watch 4 Little Girls (the Spike Lee film about the Birmingham church bombing). [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
The trial tested a rarely used criminal statute meant to ensure that people comply with congressional subpoenas. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:48 pm
” [via FindLaw] People v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Sarah Burstein: Reichman is worried that designs can’t satisfy nonobviousness—but the Federal Circuit has removed constraints.Reichman: the Fed Cir has improved it; but still, nonobviousness means that people don’t apply—the lawyers tell the designer there’s no chance. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 8:09 am
Zion Bank v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
Brighton’s Argus newspaper breached the Editors’ Code with a story which claimed the local council evicted homeless people from tents on New Year’s Day. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 6:12 am
"Location pins you down a hell of a lot," said Lee Tien, a lawyer for the Electronic Frontier Foundation. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 1:28 pm
Ryan Scoville discussed Congress’ role in international diplomacy, following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
