Search for: "People v. Lines"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 12,237
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2008, 6:13 am
Under these circumstances, when the time period charged, namely seven months, approaches the nine-month period found to be per se unreasonable in People v Beauchamp (74 NY2d 639; see People v Sedlock, 8 NY3d at 538), the People are subjected to "proportionally heightened scrutiny" as to whether their inability to provide more precise times is justified (id at 539). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
In a part of Bush v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 5:06 pm
They set out a bright line rule – that a link by itself should “never” be seen as publication of the material to which it refers – that seems too simplistic. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 7:52 am
State v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 12:00 am
Buckley v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
RJAM, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
” In Davis v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 1:01 pm
Because people with money on the line are much, much, much smarter than people in black robes who might say "Oh, it's only an investigation, no actual fraud. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:13 pm
These were in response to Stonewall adverts, also on London buses, which promoted gay marriage rights with the slogan ”Some people are gay. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 6:00 am
Bright line rules are always that way. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 7:37 am
This announcement caught many people’s attention. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:39 am
Such was the case with Pat V. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
A law which confers a discretion is not in itself inconsistent with this requirement, provided the scope of the discretion and the manner of its exercise are indicated with sufficient clarity to give the individual protection against interference which is arbitrary: Goodwin v United Kingdom (1996) 22 EHRR 123 , para 31; Sorvisto v Finland , para 112. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
The Supreme Court granted cert. in Kennedy v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 11:16 am
Blum v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:26 am
Among other cases in this line: Mehmet v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 1:09 pm
The Supreme Court debated Tuesday whether young teenagers convicted of killing someone may be locked up for life with no chance of parole, the latest in a line of cases seeking a second chance for young people. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 1:02 pm
Where does the court draw the line ? [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 11:17 am
Vishnu Kannan and Margaret Taylor summarized Friday’s oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 10:17 am
Haaland (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act) Meeks v. [read post]
