Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 1161 - 1180 of 178,346
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2016, 6:43 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" Moreover, there was no prejudice to defendants resulting from plaintiff's delay, and they did not even object when plaintiff sought reinstatement. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 6:36 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
The defendants said they were not obligated to pay any lawyer’s fees because the plaintiffs total award was not 25 percent higher than the original aggregate settlement offer. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 6:36 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
The defendants said they were not obligated to pay any lawyer’s fees because the plaintiffs total award was not 25 percent higher than the original aggregate settlement offer. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:55 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Law enforcement tapped plaintiff's phone to listen in on her husband's conversations, as he was the subject of a white-collar fraud inquiry. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 1:17 pm by Josh Blackman and Ilya Shapiro
First, does the ACA’s individual mandate inflict an injury sufficient to give the plaintiffs standing under Article III of the Constitution? [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 7:12 am by Foran & Foran, P.A.
In some Maryland personal injury cases, the plaintiffs may have multiple, alternative theories of negligence that could establish the defendant’s liability. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:33 am by John Day
The trial court dismissed plaintiffs case at summary judgment based on plaintiffs failure to strictly adhere to the requirements of the pre-suit notice statute, and plaintiff appealed. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:05 pm by Tobin Admin
As a result, the Court denied the plaintiffs Motion to Strike the defendant’s Answer for Spoliation. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 6:23 am by Antitrust Today
  The plaintiffs in the California case allege that Apple and AT&T violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act by agreeing to bind iPhones to AT&T’s network for five years, even though consumers who bought iPhones agreed to contracts with AT&T lasting only two years. [read post]
11 Mar 2005, 2:11 am
[JURIST] Vietnamese plaintiffs have condemned a US district judge's dismissal [JURIST report] of their class action against Agent Orange manufacturers for alleged harms since the defoliant was used by the US military. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 9:45 am
[JURIST] Plaintiffs in the 10-year-old Indian Trust case [Cobell v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:43 am by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
Court holds that Facebook, LinkedIn and MySpace postings relating to plaintiffs emotional state must be produced in discovery. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 8:14 am by Bilodeau Capalbo, LLC
Continue reading → The post Rhode Island Supreme Court Denies Plaintiffs Request for Specific Performance in Real Estate Dispute appeared first on Rhode Island Real Estate Lawyer Blog. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:49 pm by Narendra Ghosh
In a unanimous decision, the North Carolina Court of Appeals upheld the trial court’s decision awarding Plaintiff Rebecca Davis joint custody of the child she raised with her former domestic partner: Defendant Margaret Swan appeals from an order granting Plaintiff Rebecca Davis joint legal custody and secondary physical custody of Swan’s biological child (“minor child”). [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 8:11 am by emagraken
 After factoring this split in the Plaintiffs assessed damages came to  $28,305. [read post]
20 May 2009, 12:55 pm
  Here's an EPIC letter flagging similar issues around gmail contextual advertising. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 8:13 am
This uncontroverted evidence establishes a nexus between plaintiff's delay and [defendant's] expenditures related to [the accused products]. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 6:10 am
We collected the names of the proposed lead plaintiff(s) for each initial motion, whether the plaintiffs were institutional investors, their claimed losses, and the law firm(s) filing the motion. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 1:49 pm by Gallivan & Gallivan
According to the footage, there was no sign that the rug was defective prior to plaintiffs fall. [read post]