Search for: "Powell v. Powell"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,973
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2021, 9:23 am
Notable Events of the Week: “President Biden warned President Vladimir V. [read post]
29 May 2009, 4:55 pm
., in Jacksonville, Florida, was on the winning side of Taylor v. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 6:48 am
We know from the various Article 8 cases (Qazi [at 54], Powell [at 35] and Thurrock v West [at 25]) that local authorities are considered to know their own communities best and are better equipped than courts to make decisions about the use of their housing stock. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
Kennedy, lately the court’s swing justice, who replaced Justice Powell. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
Kennedy, lately the court’s swing justice, who replaced Justice Powell. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 1:20 pm
[2] Bradley v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:11 am
For the very sensible reasons explained by the Supreme Court of the United States in Powell v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 7:00 pm
In O’Connor v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:39 pm
See Jordan v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:35 am
Mark Lemley filed a brief on behalf of Powell Books, et al. that runs in parallel with a brief filed by a group of art museums. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:10 am
Co. v Schmitt, 265 AD2d at 300; Schaut v Fireman's Ins. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
R (Humberstone) v Legal Services Commission [2010] EWHC 760 (Admin) – Read case Part 2 of Matthew Hill’s feature on the duty to investigate deaths under human rights law (read Part I). [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 7:06 am
SEC, FTC v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
In Kokesh v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
The majority also claimed its work was already done by 1968’s Powell v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 6:00 pm
Coker v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 5:09 pm
(See ZAVALAS v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 12:53 pm
Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 619 (1973)In re Persico. 522 F.2d 52, 54 (2d Cir. [1975])Powell v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:01 am
Part I of the paper presents Justice Lewis Powell's famous attack on presumed damages in Gertz v. [read post]
