Search for: "Public Citizen v. Department of Justice"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,965
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
To the best of our knowledge, there is no explanation of the circumstances requiring these ordinances published on the websites of the President’s Secretariat, the Prime Minister’s Office, the Ministry of Home Affairs, the Department of Telecommunications nor the Ministry of Law and Justice as on the date of the writing of this note. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 12:39 pm
In last year’s Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:06 pm
These arguments will be heard via teleconference, with lawyers connecting to the justices over the phone, and, most interestingly, the public will be allowed to listen live. [read post]
19 May 2014, 6:09 am
” While recognizing the enormous gains to be realized through the application of new technologies which generate and gather enormous amounts of data, the report warns that data and privacy protections stemming from the Fourth Amendment and famously enunciated by the dissent of Justice Brandeis in the 1928 Supreme Court case, Olmstead v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:46 am
The rationale comes from ICE as an agency within the federal government’s Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:35 am
These kinds of crimes are offenses “(1) which are extremely serious, (2) which in some way corrupt or subvert the political and governmental process, and (3) which are plainly wrong in themselves to a person of honor, or to a good citizen, regardless or wards on the statute books. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:15 am
Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2481 (Admin) (30 September 2011) Detention of Israeli Arab activist Raed Salah Mahajna lawful save for 1.5 days when not told full reasons for detention. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 5:00 pm
The Texas Department of Public Safety maintains an online public database of the state's sex offender registry featuring free sex offender searches by name or location. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 6:11 am
In his infamous opinion in Dred Scott, Chief Justice Roger Taney concluded that Black Americans could not be citizens in part precisely because they were denied various legal rights. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
The Institute for Justice (one of the public interest law firms that I most respect) petitioned the Court to decide whether the Excessive Fines Clause is incorporated, arguing that lower courts had disagreed sharply on the question. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
Most recently, in McDonald v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 1:16 pm
Hill had violated no law (except maybe public decency?) [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 4:54 pm
There were two distinct parts to Chief Justice John G. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Supreme Court ruled that sodomy could be a crime, and it was not until 2003, two years after my book came out, that the Justices reversed themselves in Lawrence v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 4:56 pm
Engle v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
The Reagan Justice Department (in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito served) was often quite forceful in invoking Chevron wherever it might apply.Chevron deference has been thought by some to be anomalous in an era when the Court doesn’t really defer to Congress. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:09 pm
Department of Public Health court ruling in 2003. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:15 pm
As the Supreme Court explained in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 11:18 am
Constitution acknowledges each citizen’s right to bear arms, both state and federal laws exist that curtail the free use and transport of firearms in Texas. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:00 am
Nevertheless, a quick review of basic Department of Justice (“DOJ”) policies, as set out in the United States Attorneys’ Manual (“USAM”) is helpful for the witness who has been subpoenaed to the grand jury. [read post]
