Search for: "Public Storage, Inc."
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
In this case, I mean See Also references to case comments linked to outside sources as in the image below for Sumner v PCL Constructors Inc., 2011 ABCA 326 (CanLII),http://canlii.ca/t/fnws8. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 4:00 pm
The Sunset Park Waterfront Vision Plan combines strategic investments and targeted policies to reactivate the area's industrial uses, create jobs and provide public waterfront access within the City's Southwest Brooklyn Industrial Business Zone. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (Afro-IP)Australia Professor Fitzgerald’s opinion article ‘It’s vital to sort out ownership of ideas’: (IP:KCE)BrazilBrazil wrestles with decision on GM corn, seed patenting: (Intellectual Property Watch),PTO recognized as international patent search authority: (International Law Office)CanadaTrade mark statistics - CIPO 2006-2007 Annual Report: (Canadian Trademark Blog)IP injunctions in Canada: (ipblog.ca),Professor Ariel Katz’ research project on… [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:17 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
Chewey, Inc., OSHRC Docket No. 19-0868, 2022 WL 1009607 (February 22, 2022). [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm
Procedural History The Boardwalk MLP public unitholders filed suit and claimed that the general partner improperly exercised the call right. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:29 am
First there is a physical search, followed by a physical seizure of the electronic storage devices. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here EPA Seeks Public Comment on Proposed Exide Technologies Cleanup Plan for Bernhart Park. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
’ – London: (IPKat), 18 June: CC technology summit – California: (creativecommons.org), 18-20 June: IIR generic drugs summit – Washington: (Orange Book Blog), 18-20 June / 9-11 July: US PLI: ‘Fundamentals of patent prosecution 2008: A boot camp for claim drafting & amendment writing’ – New York / San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 19-20 June: 27th ECTA Conference ‘Forty shades of green: a tour of the IP… [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
(Sierra Club, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
Public interest factors are also playing out in the courts. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
The FBI claims that there may be “relevant, critical communications and data” on the iPhone from around the time of the shooting (the FBI has already sought and received from Apple all data from any cloud storage connected to the device). [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm
Kerry Sheehan, Public Knowledge: Congress made an explicit choice in 512(m) rejecting any duty to monitor and seek out facts b/c of impact of surveillance on public’s ability to engage w/each other openly. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:20 pm
Now it’s those engaged in storage and display who bear no costs or responsibility while content draws users to their sites and generates ad revenue. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:37 pm
UB then failed to properly store both transformers, mark the storage areas with the proper labeling, and failed to mark each transformer with the date it was removed from service. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 2:25 pm
UB then failed to properly store both transformers, mark the storage areas with the proper labeling, and failed to mark each transformer with the date it was removed from service. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:00 pm
" After the war, Dad settled in Levittown, New York, worked for his father in the children’s coat business and eventually founded his own firm, Bogene, Inc., which manufactured and sold plastic storage good such as garment bags and shoe bags. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm
John Reed Stark David Fontaine It is well understood by now that cyber security is a concern for every organization and that it is an issue on which every company’s board should be focused. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 4:40 am
Reading such a new requirement into PIPEDA is not required to protect the public, it cannot be justified when construing PIPEDA under well established canons of interpretation, and would have detrimental consequences that would inhibit legitimate uses of personal information and create barriers to trade and innovation. [read post]
