Search for: "Ray v. State" Results 1161 - 1180 of 1,938
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Joshua Matz
At the San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz discusses United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Joshua Matz
At the San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz discusses United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 10:30 am by Ray Dowd
Breaking news here.Perhaps most significant was the US Supreme Court's decision in Golan v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 7:41 am by Steve Hall
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
Phelan, 9 F.3d 882, 887 (10th Cir. 1993) (“[a]s a federal court, we are generally reticent to expand state law without clear guidance from its highest court”); Aclys International v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:00 am by Rob Robinson
read.bi/uY0Xjx (Ramon Ray) Twitter Hashtags of the Week #eDiscovery #eDisclosure #LTNY Vendor Views Industry Landscape 17a-4 Announces New Interfaces as Part of the DataParser 7.0 Release - bit.ly/w7cJ9M (PR Web) 2012: Out with the Old, In with the New! [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 6:04 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
We’ll list out each judgement and give links to descriptive comments/ critique on each of the cases. 1) State of Maharashtra v. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 10:35 am by SJM
The fact-finding hearing in The Queen (KN) v LB Barnet [2011] EWHC 2019 (Admin) was heard as long ago as July 2011 but it is worth underlining here as an example of the way the Administrative Court deals with age assessments in the light of the guidance given by the Supreme Court in A v Croydon. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 10:35 am by SJM
The fact-finding hearing in The Queen (KN) v LB Barnet [2011] EWHC 2019 (Admin) was heard as long ago as July 2011 but it is worth underlining here as an example of the way the Administrative Court deals with age assessments in the light of the guidance given by the Supreme Court in A v Croydon. [read post]