Search for: "Read v. People"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 21,613
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2008, 10:34 am
Q: Where do I get a copy of Roe v. [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 10:00 pm
Background of the Case In People v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:06 am
Buck v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm
Under this section, a hearing impaired juror may sit, but only if he or she “is capable of doing what jurors are supposed to do,” including hearing and evaluating the testimony through lip-reading, use of assistive devices, or other means (People v Guay, 72 AD3d 1201, 1202 [3rd Dept 2010], citing People v Guzman, 76 NY2d 1, 5 [1990]; see CPL § 270.20 [1][a]; Judiciary Law § 510).In Guay, the Third Department affirmed… [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 7:49 am
By Lane V. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 1:42 pm
Haeger v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 10:55 am
From Reade v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:39 am
Notes for--Planned Parenthood of SE PA v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 5:29 pm
Nunez v. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 8:29 am
Supreme Court’s thirty-five-page opinion in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 12:23 pm
when I read this snippet from a report about Live Earth: Given a choice of four major issues before the United States today, 36% named the war in Iraq as most important. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:56 am
In particular, the magistrate judge relied on the Supreme Court’s recent landmark decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Blueford v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 7:00 am
Take Our PollCategory 4 — Other #1 1491s v. #5 Cohen Handbook It appears the number of people who reject NFL racism outnumbers the Cobell class pool; I’d say we have a victory of humor over angst. [read post]
20 May 2014, 9:12 am
Pixley v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 6:12 am
Weeks v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 8:44 pm
Cal. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 8:44 pm
Cal. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Several of the majority decisions in Stott endorsed Lord Walker’s analysis in R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] UKHL 63, [2009] 2 All ER 556 that the characteristics which fell within ECHR, art 14 were like a series of concentric circles: with the most personal innate characteristics being at the centre and requiring a high level of justification for differential treatment, and acquired characteristics (which are more concerned with what people do, or… [read post]
