Search for: "Russell v. State" Results 1161 - 1180 of 2,757
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2018, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
” NFIB weighs in on Knick v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” In Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 7:52 am by Conor McEvily
Delia and United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 8:41 am by Ronald Mann
Thomas Goldstein of Goldstein & Russell, representing Imburgia, bravely takes on the defense of the California court. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 8:55 am by Amy Howe
The highest-profile grant of the day came in United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 11:58 am by Lyle Denniston
Masica — whether the National Park Service has the authority to ban fishing with a hovercraft on lands within a national park but owned by a state, an Indian entity, or private individuals [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in Heffernan v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At ReligiousLiberty.TV, Michael Peabody notes that “[t]he Solicitor General … has recommended that the United States Supreme Court agree to consider [Patterson v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm by Ronald Mann
This morning brought decisions in both of the patent cases argued in November, with the government prevailing on the constitutional question raised in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court’s door again” after a state court found for a second time that Moore is not too intellectually disabled to be executed. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
[Federalist Society podcast with Ilya Shapiro, Cato on Supreme Court case of Packingham v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 9:54 pm
tweetmeme_url = 'http://www.law.louisville.edu/cardinallawyer/node/233'; tweetmeme_service = 'bit.ly'; tweetmeme_source = 'chenx064'; The United States Supreme Court's blockbuster decision in Citizens United v. [read post]