Search for: "S.C.1" Results 1161 - 1180 of 1,303
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am by Antonin Pribetic
.), which dealt with enforcement of a default judgment obtained in Florida against four Ontario defendants arising from a mistaken property lot description. 1 In a six to three split decision, the Supreme Court of Canada majority held that the “real and substantial connection” test, which until then only applied to interprovincial judgments, should equally apply to the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. 2 Both the majority and dissenting judgments in Beals… [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 12:48 pm by Adam Feldman
The scores range from +1 for a positive sentiment to -1 for a negative sentiment, with zero as neutral. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 11:42 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (1)-(2) were, in fact, “clearly without merit and hardly worth addressing,” since that wasn’t what plaintiffs were arguing. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:57 am by admin
The Spartanburg, S.C., company has 2,360 payday-loan offices, including 13 opened this year. [read post]
25 May 2009, 7:15 am
No. 31 September Term 2003 (Motion for Stay of Execution and Supporting Exhibits, Exhibit 9, Appendix B, filed June 1, 2004, motion denied, State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 6:59 am by Alexandre Daoust
Bref regard sur les propriétés olympiques… Le symbole olympique [1] est certainement une des marques de commerce les plus connues et les plus lucratives sur la scène internationale. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 10:45 pm by Ben Vernia
Other Fraud Recoveries A $45 million settlement with Japan-based Toyo Ink S.C. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:22 pm by Bexis
We had the issue of when a lawyer can, and can’t, confer with his/her own witness during a deposition come up recently in one of our cases. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:36 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Chapter 1 is a story about modern tribal economies, using the Crow Nation and the Northern Cheyenne Tribe as examples of failed tribes. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
Burns listed four elements: (1) the "significance and extent of exposure," (2) the "toxicity of [the substance], [and] the seriousness of the [harm] ... for which the individuals are at risk," (3) the "relative increase" in risk "in those exposed," and (4) "monitor[ing] the effects of exposure. . .is reasonable and necessary. [read post]