Search for: "S.C.1"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,303
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2009, 3:06 pm
In a ruling that appears to be the first of its kind anywhere in the world, Master Harper of the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory held that the lawyer could use the social networking site to serve court notices.1 The Facebook profiles showed the co-defendants’ dates of birth, email addresses and ‘friend’ lists and declared the co-defendants to be friends of one another. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 8:25 pm
They include: 1. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 11:00 am
The opinions expressed on this site are not the opinions of Whyte Hirschboeck Dudek S.C.. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:28 pm
Sherer, 377 S.C. 185, 200, 659 S.E.2d 196 (Ct.App. 2008). [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
Stevenson, 305 S.C. 104, 406 S.E.2d 350 (1991), erred by failing to take up a de novo review of the Gore "guideposts. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:40 am
Greenville County, 590 S.E.2d 338, 343 (S.C. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 5:36 pm
19(1)(b) of the Act) is a form of fraud. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 5:51 am
The South Carolina Court of Appeals interpreted S.C. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:42 am
Why Boxee did this is unclear as is what, if any, action Hulu plans on taking. 3: Re/Max says local agency’s logo too similar to its own Finally today, in a trademark story from my native South Carolina, real estate agency Re/Max has filed a trademark dispute lawsuit against Charleston, S.C. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 11:22 am
S.C. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 9:13 am
UPDATED TO 1:40 p.m. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 10:29 am
S.C. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 1:11 am
Giles, 343 S.C. 708, 541 S.E.2d 857 (Ct. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 12:34 pm
Yacht Cove Homeowners Ass'n (S.C. 1986) 345 S.E.2d 709.) [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 9:01 am
Filed 1/14/09 Jessica Lang (USDC, S.C.) [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 10:54 am
Such an approach prevents the district court from effectively reviewing the magistrate judge's order, and frustrates one of the purposes of 28 U .S.C. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 9:00 am
The granted issue is "WHETHER (1) THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN ADOPTING A TEST TO DETERMINE WHETHER APPELLANT'S ASSERTION OF HIS RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT WAS SCRUPULOUSLY HONORED THAT DIFFERS FROM THE TESTS SET FORTH BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IN MICHIGAN v. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 3:24 pm
MSA of Myrtle Beach, Inc., 644 S.E.2d 663 (S.C. 2007); Scott v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
The Hartford Casualty Insurance Co., Inc., 299 S.C. 164, 383 S.E.2d (S.C. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 9:54 pm
Wheeler, [1994] 1 S.C.R. 359, 113 DLR (4th) 1, where Cory J. confirmed at 13 that an employee who uses sick leave in order to receive wages while off work and loses those sick day credits is entitled to receive compensation. [58] In Roberts v. [read post]
