Search for: "SELLERS v. STATE"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 3,683
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2018, 1:19 pm
Whatever a willing buyer and seller of such an item would agree upon. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 5:20 am
In Miles v. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 12:28 pm
In Online Healthnow, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 4:22 am
Kachina Pipeline Company v. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 10:55 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 2:45 am
Seventeen states allow local income taxes in addition to state-level personal income taxes. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 3:43 am
It is also questionable whether the Court was correct in stating that consumer perception will only be relevant in certain circumstances, when the CJEU stated at least twice in Louboutin (at least in the English translation – see paras 43 and 48) that it was ‘necessary’, in order to determine whether a marketplace operator makes ‘use’ of a sign, to assess consumer perception. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 4:09 am
., Inv. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:49 pm
And they find one potential source in the famous ProCD v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:46 am
Before Prima Paint Corp. v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 6:44 am
Citing United States v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 6:44 am
Citing United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2006, 6:06 am
In Johnny Blastoff, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 2:24 pm
In a 1931 opinion, Manufacturers Finance Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 1:00 pm
At oral argument yesterday in Hawaii v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 12:55 am
Following the Advocate General’s opinion [on which see Jeremy’s post here], yesterday the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) rendered its decision in Case C-360/12 Coty Germany GmbH v First Note Perfumes NV. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 12:20 pm
State ex rel. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 9:37 am
United States, Ohio v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:18 pm
Smith v. [read post]
