Search for: "STATE v BIRD" Results 1161 - 1180 of 1,282
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm by Ezra Rosser
(Re)Emerging Issues The Seattle/Louisville Decision and the Future of Race-Conscious Programs Philip Tegeler Separate ≠ Equal: Mexican Americans Before Brown v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 11:35 am by Ad Law Defense
”  Organic Consumers Association et al v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 9:17 pm by John Culhane
In one case, Goddard v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
Click Here Cory King settles with state on feedlot charges. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm by fjhinojosa
Gonzalez is cited in the following case: Kim Cramton v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
Outlining his approach, Wood Ch. observed: “[15] …the problem complained of has denied them the opportunity of maintaining the grave in a dignified and respectful state despite their best endeavours. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:27 pm by Érika Bergeron-Drolet
High profile cases in the United States and Canada include the 2011 claim against Warner Bros. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:13 pm by David Kravets
One of the Obama administration’s main arguments in support of warrantless GPS tracking is the high court’s 1983 decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:17 am by David Kravets
One of the Obama administration’s main arguments in support of warrantless GPS tracking was the high court’s 1983 decision in United States v. [read post]