Search for: "STATE v CLARK" Results 1161 - 1180 of 3,829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2017, 6:53 am by Charles Wilbrand
Clark that under the Federal Arbitration Act, States cannot put more stringent requirements to forming an arbitration agreement compared to other contracts. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:53 am by Charles Wilbrand
Clark that under the Federal Arbitration Act, States cannot put more stringent requirements to forming an arbitration agreement compared to other contracts. [read post]
18 May 2017, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Workplace Prof Blog, Jeff Hirsch discusses Clark v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 9:12 am by Workplace Prof
Yesterday, the Supreme Court asked the Solicitor General to weigh in on the issue presented for cert. in Clark v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
At The National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen notes that in District of Columbia v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 7:48 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Clark boosts the ability of health care and other businesses and employers to enforce contractual agreements to arbitrate free from State law interference. [read post]
15 May 2017, 12:12 pm by Matthew Kahn
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument today in Hawaii v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 10:57 am by Mark Weidemaier
Supreme Court decided Kindred Nursing v Clark, an arbitration case in which the Kentucky Supreme Court declined to enforce arbitration agreements between a nursing home and two patients. [read post]
15 May 2017, 10:03 am by Autumn Callan
Clark [SCOTUSBlog materials] on Monday holding that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) [LII materials] preempts a Kentucky state law that requires a power-of-attorney agreements to expressly grant authority to enter an arbitration agreement. [read post]
15 May 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Oleske, Jr. and Robin Fretwell Wilson. 20 Lewis & Clark Law Review 1093-1458 (2017).Allan W. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:06 am
The distinctive dog deviceAzumi Ltd v Zuma's Choice Pet Products Ltd [2017] EWHC 609 is a case about a dog's purpose. [read post]
10 May 2017, 1:29 pm
Co. (1998) 71 Cal.App.4th 38, 52 [federal decisions neither binding nor controlling on matters of state law]), but are bound to follow Rusheen v. [read post]